4.6 Review

Reproductive outcome of patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment and diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis or abnormal vaginal microbiota: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15178

关键词

Abnormal vaginal microbiota; bacterial vaginosis; early spontaneous abortion; in vitro fertilisation; live birth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Despite recent efforts, the risks associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) or abnormal vaginal microbiota in IVF patients are not well-established. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the risks associated with BV in IVF patients using meta-analysis. Search strategy Following preliminary searches to find relevant keywords and MeSH terms, a systematic search was performed in PubMed (MEDLINE) in September 2017. Selection criteria The population was infertile women attending IVF treatment. The exposure was BV or abnormal vaginal microbiota. Outcomes included live birth rate, early spontaneous abortion rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Data collection and analysis Data were collected for each study and for each outcome using a summary of findings table. If appropriate, data were quantitatively assessed using meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, funnel plots and GRADE evidence assessment were performed for the above-mentioned outcomes. Main results A total of 12 studies were eligible, comprising a total of 2980 patients. The prevalence of BV was 16% (95% CI 15-18%) in the general study population and tubal factor infertility was highly prevalent in patients diagnosed with BV compared with normal vaginal microbiota patients (P = 0.001). Despite a significant association with early spontaneous abortion [relative risk (RR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.27], BV did not significantly impact the live birth rate (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.96-1.57) or the clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.15). Conclusions BV is associated with tubal factor infertility and early spontaneous abortion. However, the quality of evidence was very low and the equivocal results justify the need for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据