4.7 Article

Urinary tract endometriosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management, and proposal for a new clinical classification

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 147-152

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.028

关键词

Deep infiltrating endometriosis; rectovaginal endometriotic nodule; ureteral endometriosis; ureterolysis; urinary tract endometriosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To analyze the prevalence of urinary tract endometriosis (UTE) in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and to define potential criteria for preoperative workup. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Six hundred ninety-seven patients with endometriosis. Intervention(s): Excision of all endometriotic lesions. Main Outcome Measure(s): Correlation of preoperative features and intraoperative findings in patients with UTE. Result(s): Out of 213 patients presenting DIE, 52.6% suffered from UTE. In patients with ureteral endometriosis, symptoms were not specific. Among the patients with bladder endometriosis, 68.8% complained of urinary symptoms compared to 7.9% in the group of patients without UTE. In patients with rectovaginal endometriosis, the probability of ureterolysis showed a linear correlation with the size of the nodule. We found that 3 cm in diameter provided a specific cutoff value for the likelihood of ureteric involvement. Conclusion(s): The prevalence of UTE has often been underestimated. Preoperative questioning is important in the search for bladder endometriosis. The size of the nodule is one of the few reliable criteria in preoperative assessment that can suggest ureteric involvement. We propose a classification of ureteral endometriosis that will allow the standardization of terminology and help to compare the outcome of different surgical treatment in randomized studies. (C)2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据