4.7 Article

MiR-21 promotes ECM degradation through inhibiting autophagy via the PTEN/akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human degenerated NP cells

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 725-734

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.154

关键词

miR-21; IDD; PTEN; Autophagy; ECM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570946]
  2. key research and development plan in Hunan Province [2017SK2104]
  3. key Project of health and family planning commission in Hunan Province [A2017016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is the most common cause leading to low back pain, a highly prevalent, costly and crippling condition worldwide. Overexpression of miR-21 has been shown to promote proliferation of nucleus pulposus (NP) cells. However, it remains unclear whether miR-21 can promote the degradation of type II collagen (Col II) and aggrecan, two main extracellular matrix components within the disc. Here, the miRNA microassay assay identified 29 differentially expressed miRNAs in NP tissues from IDD patients compared with healthy controls. Following qRT-PCR validation, miR-21 expression was significantly upregulated in degenerated NP tissues, and showed a positive correlation with disc degeneration grade. Through gain-of-function and loss-of-function studies in human NP cells, miR-21 was shown to inhibit autophagy and then upregulate the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 and MMP-9, leading to increased degradation of Col II and aggrecan. Mechanistically, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) was identified as a direct target of miR-21, and activated PTEN/ Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway was involved in miR-21-induced autophagy inhibition and Col II and aggrecan breakdown. Taken together, these results suggest that miR-21 contributes to Col II and aggrecan catabolism by inhibiting autophagy via the PTEN/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in human NP cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据