4.7 Review

The influence of hedgerow structural condition on wildlife habitat provision in farmed landscapes

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 122-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.02.017

关键词

Hedgerow; Habitat structure; Management; Conservation; Agri-environment

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) as part of the IAPETUS Doctoral Training Partnership award [NE/L002590/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [1511825, ceh020012] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [ceh020012] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this review, we discuss the role of hedgerow structure and condition in determining the value of hedgerow habitat for biodiversity conservation within an agricultural context, to inform and evaluate hedgerow management decisions and policy. Through a systematic literature review, narrative synthesis and vote counting, key structural condition indicators were identified for a range of conservation priority taxa. Abundance, survival or fecundity of ground vegetation, birds, mammals and invertebrates were affected by height, width, woody biomass, foliar quality and quantity, and gappiness of hedgerows. Although general patterns may not occur, a response to a particular structural feature can vary both within and between taxonomic groups, many responses are synergistic and interdependent. In conclusion, the definition of a good quality hedgerow for biodiversity conservation should be expanded to include all those key structural features which are important across taxa. Furthermore, the importance of heterogeneity in hedgerow structural condition is highlighted, where no fixed set of hedgerow characteristics were found to benefit all taxa. If uniform hedgerow management is over prescribed, as has been the tendency with some agri-environment schemes, some species (including those of conservation concern) are likely to be adversely affected by a loss of suitable habitat or resource decline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据