4.7 Article

The wild origin dilemma

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 203-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.011

关键词

CITES; Enforcement; Horticulture; Illegal wildlife trade; Orchidaceae; Traceability

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/J500458/1]
  2. Oxford Martin Programme on the Illegal Wildlife Trade
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [1117644] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sustainable production and trade of plants, animals, and their products, including through artificial propagation and captive breeding, is an important strategy to supply the global wildlife market, particularly when the trade in wild specimens is restricted by CITES or other wildlife trade legislation. However, these production methods can become a potential mechanism for the laundering of material illegally collected from the wild, leading to recent calls for the development of traceability methods to determine the origin of traded products. Currently, identifying wild origin can be complex and may require expert knowledge and/or resource intensive molecular techniques. Here we show, using CITES Appendix I slipper orchids as a model system, that production times can be used as a threshold to identify plants in trade that have a high likelihood of being of wild origin. We suggest that this framework could be used by enforcement officers, online vendors, and others to flag material of potential concern for orchids and other high value plants in trade. Specifically, this knowledge combined with nomenclature and the list of CITES Trade Database species could be used to construct a species watch list and automate online searches. The results suggest that had this been applied, questions would have been raised regarding online sales of three recently described species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据