4.7 Article

The threats endangering Australia's at-risk fauna

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 172-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.029

关键词

Extinction risk; Body mass; Prioritization; Conservation; Vulnerability; Threatened species

资金

  1. Brazilian Science Without Borders program
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE140101389, DE150101552]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
  5. Australian Research Council [DE140101389, DE150101552] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reducing the rate of species extinctions is one of the great challenges of our time. Understanding patterns in the distribution and frequency of both threatened species and the threatening processes affecting them improves our ability to mitigate threats and prioritize management actions. In this quantitative synthesis of processes threatening Australian at-risk fauna, we find that species are impacted by a median of six threats (range 1-19), though there is considerable variation in numbers of threats among major taxonomic groups. Invasive species, habitat loss, biological resource use, natural systems modification and climate change are the processes most commonly affecting Australian threatened species. We identified an uneven distribution of research knowledge among species, with half of the total number of species-specific peer-reviewed scientific publications associated with only 11 threatened species (2.7%). Furthermore, the number of threats associated with each species was correlated with the research effort for that species, and research effort was correlated with body mass. Hence, there appears to be a research bias towards larger-bodied species, and certain charismatic species, that could result in inferences biased towards these favored species. However, after accounting for these effects we found that for birds, amphibians, reptiles and marine mammals body mass is positively correlated with the number of threats associated with each species. Many threats also co-occur, indicating that threat syndromes may be common.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Global rarity of intact coastal regions

Brooke A. Williams, James E. M. Watson, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Carissa J. Klein, Jamie Montgomery, Rebecca K. Runting, Leslie A. Roberson, Benjamin S. Halpern, Hedley S. Grantham, Caitlin D. Kuempel, Melanie Frazier, Oscar Venter, Amelia Wenger

Summary: Management of the land-sea interface is crucial for global conservation and sustainability objectives. However, current assessments of coastal regions are limited by their focus on either the terrestrial or marine realm. The global assessment revealed that only 15.5% of coastal regions have low anthropogenic pressure, while 47.9% are heavily affected by human activities. In most countries, more than half of their coastal regions are degraded. Additionally, nearly half of the protected areas in coastal regions are exposed to high human pressures.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Predicting landscape-scale biodiversity recovery by natural tropical forest regrowth

Pablo Prieto, Jacob J. Bukoski, Felipe S. M. Barros, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Alvaro Iribarrem, Pedro H. S. Brancalion, Robin L. Chazdon, David B. Lindenmayer, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Manuel R. Guariguata, Renato Crouzeilles

Summary: Predicting and mapping the recovery of species richness and total abundance in tropical and subtropical second-growth forests can inform spatial restoration planning. The study found that socioenvironmental factors influenced the recovery of biodiversity in second-growth forests. Natural forest regrowth in tropical and subtropical forest landscapes has the potential to promote biodiversity recovery.

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Accelerated shifts in terrestrial life zones under rapid climate change

Paul R. Elsen, Earl C. Saxon, B. Alexander Simmons, Michelle Ward, Brooke A. Williams, Hedley S. Grantham, Salit Kark, Noam Levin, Katharina-Victoria Perez-Hammerle, April E. Reside, James E. M. Watson

Summary: Rapid climate change is impacting biodiversity, ecosystem function, and human well-being, resulting in changes to the distribution of terrestrial life zones, with the pace of change accelerating. These changes have already had negative consequences for social and ecological systems.

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2022)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Reconsidering priorities for forest conservation when considering the threats of mining and armed conflict

Brooke A. Williams, Hedley S. Grantham, James E. M. Watson, Aurelie C. Shapiro, Andrew J. Plumptre, Samuel Ayebare, Elizabeth Goldman, Ayesha I. T. Tulloch

Summary: Many threats to biodiversity are well mapped, while others are uncertain in their extent and impact. This study highlights the importance of considering all threats, both certain and uncertain, in spatial conservation planning.
Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity

James R. Allan, Hugh P. Possingham, Scott C. Atkinson, Anthony Waldron, Moreno Di Marco, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Vanessa M. Adams, W. Daniel Kissling, Thomas Worsdell, Chris Sandbrook, Gwili Gibbon, Kundan Kumar, Piyush Mehta, Martine Maron, Brooke A. Williams, Kendall R. Jones, Brendan A. Wintle, April E. Reside, James E. M. Watson

Summary: Ambitious conservation efforts are necessary to address the global biodiversity crisis. This study estimates the minimum land area required to protect important biodiversity areas, ecologically intact areas, and optimal locations for representation of species ranges and ecoregions. At least 64 million square kilometers of land would need conservation attention, which is 44% of the terrestrial area. Immediate action is needed as 1.3 million square kilometers of this land is at risk of conversion for intensive human land uses by 2030.

SCIENCE (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

A comparison of approaches for including connectivity in systematic conservation planning

Jeffrey O. Hanson, Jaimie Vincent, Richard Schuster, Lenore Fahrig, Angela Brennan, Amanda E. Martin, Josie S. Hughes, Richard Pither, Joseph R. Bennett

Summary: This study examines eight approaches for promoting connectivity in prioritizations and finds that different methods can lead to very different or very similar prioritizations, depending on their underlying assumptions. Some approaches based on very different underlying assumptions produce similar prioritizations, while widely used methods such as the boundary length approach can result in prioritizations that are highly dissimilar to others.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2022)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Reply to: Restoration prioritization must be informed by marginalized people

Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Alvaro Iribarrem, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Carlos Leandro Cordeiro, Renato Crouzeilles, Catarina Jakovac, Andre Braga Junqueira, Eduardo Lacerda, Agnieszka E. Latawiec, Andrew Balmford, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Robin L. Chazdon, Karl-Heinz Erb, Pedro Brancalion, Graeme Buchanan, David Cooper, Sandra Diaz, Paul F. Donald, Valerie Kapos, David Leclere, Lera Miles, Michael Obersteiner, Christoph Plutzar, Carlos Alberto de Mattos Scaramuzza, Fabio R. Scarano, Piero Visconti

NATURE (2022)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Optimizing ecological surveys for conservation

Jeffrey O. Hanson, Jenny L. McCune, Iadine Chades, Caitlyn A. Proctor, Emma J. Hudgins, Joseph R. Bennett

Summary: Conservation decisions must be made with limited funding and incomplete information. Ecological surveys can help reduce uncertainty and potentially lead to better management decisions. However, conducting surveys can reduce funds available for implementing management actions and can potentially lead to worse conservation outcomes. Therefore, a value of information framework has been developed to evaluate and optimize survey plans.

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY (2023)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

Reply to: The risks of overstating the climate benefits of ecosystem restoration

Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Alvaro Iribarrem, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Carlos Leandro Cordeiro, Renato Crouzeilles, Catarina Jakovac, Andre Braga Junqueira, Eduardo Lacerda, Agnieszka E. Latawiec, Andrew Balmford, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Robin L. Chazdon, Karl-Heinz Erb, Pedro Brancalion, Graeme Buchanan, David Cooper, Sandra Diaz, Paul F. Donald, Valerie Kapos, David Leclere, Lera Miles, Michael Obersteiner, Christoph Plutzar, Carlos Alberto de M. Scaramuzza, Fabio R. Scarano, Piero Visconti

NATURE (2022)

Correction Multidisciplinary Sciences

Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration (vol 586, pg 724, 2022)

Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Alvaro Iribarrem, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Carlos Leandro Cordeiro, Renato Crouzeilles, Catarina C. Jakovac, Andre Braga Junqueira, Eduardo Lacerda, Agnieszka E. Latawiec, Andrew Balmford, Thomas M. Brooks, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Robin L. Chazdon, Karl-Heinz Erb, Pedro Brancalion, Graeme Buchanan, David Cooper, Sandra Diaz, Paul F. Donald, Valerie Kapos, David Leclere, Lera Miles, Michael Obersteiner, Christoph Plutzar, Carlos Alberto de M. Scaramuzza, Fabio R. Scarano, Piero Visconti

NATURE (2022)

Article Ecology

The data double standard

Allison D. Binley, Joseph R. Bennett

Summary: Conservation planning requires extensive amounts of data, and community science programs are increasingly being used to supplement traditional data collection methods. However, there is still debate over the reliability of community science data. To address this issue, this study compares the limitations and biases present in community science datasets with those in professionally collected data. The study also suggests four main solutions, including the use of statistical techniques and benchmarking, to address the challenges associated with both types of data.

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION (2023)

Article Ecology

Multicriteria optimization to develop cost-effective pes-schemes to restore multiple environmental benefits in the Brazilian Atlantic forest

Cassia M. G. Lemos, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Rebecca K. Runting, Pedro R. Andrade, Ana P. D. Aguiar

Summary: Understanding the cost-effectiveness of forest landscape restoration strategies is crucial for successful implementation. This study presents a new optimization model that maximizes biodiversity conservation, carbon stock increase, and soil loss reduction while minimizing costs. The results show that the approach achieves high levels of multiple environmental benefits in a cost-effective manner, reinforcing the importance of quantifying trade-offs among objectives before implementing restoration initiatives.

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (2023)

Article Biodiversity Conservation

Global shortfalls in threat assessments for endemic flora by country

Rachael V. Gallagher, Stuart P. Allen, Rafael Govaerts, Malin C. Rivers, Andrew P. Allen, David A. Keith, Cory Merow, Brian Maitner, Nathalie Butt, Tony D. Auld, Brian J. Enquist, Wolf L. Eiserhardt, Ian J. Wright, Jonathon C. O. Mifsud, Sylvia Espinosa-Ruiz, Hugh Possingham, Vanessa M. Adams

Summary: Systematic approaches to conservation assessment are needed to protect plant diversity. However, the completion of threat assessments for endemic plants is weakly related to a country's wealth or the level of threat that species face. The lack of assessment limits national regulation of actions that endanger plant species.

PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET (2023)

Correction Biodiversity Conservation

Multinational coordination required for conservation of over 90% of marine species (vol 27, pg 6206, 2021)

L. A. Roberson, H. L. Beyer, C. O'Hara, J. E. M. Watson, D. C. Dunn, B. S. Halpern, C. J. Klein, M. R. Frazier, C. D. Kuempel, B. Williams, H. S. Grantham, J. C. Montgomery, S. Kark, R. K. Runting

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2022)

暂无数据