4.7 Article

Chemical genetic approach identifies microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 1 as a leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 substrate

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 2980-2992

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-262329

关键词

cellular signaling; gatekeeper kinase; neuroscience; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek-Vlaanderen (Research Foundation-Flanders) [G.0666.09, KAN2012 1.5.216.12]
  2. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology [SBO/100042]
  3. European Community under the 7th Framework Programme for RTD-Grant [HEALTH-2009-241791]
  4. Fund Druwe-Eerdekens-managed by the King Baudouin Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are the most common cause of autosomal-dominant forms of Parkinson's disease. LRRK2 is a modular, multidomain protein containing 2 enzymatic domains, including a kinase domain, as well as several protein-protein interaction domains, pointing to a role in cellular signaling. Although enormous efforts have been made, the exact pathophysiologic mechanisms of LRRK2 are still not completely known. In this study, we used a chemical genetics approach to identify LRRK2 substrates from mouse brain. This approach allows the identification of substrates of 1 particular kinase in a complex cellular environment. Several of the identified peptides are involved in the regulation of microtubule (MT) dynamics, including microtubule-associating protein (MAP)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 1 (MARK1). MARK1 is a serine/threonine kinase known to phosphorylate MT-binding proteins such as Tau, MAP2, and MAP4 at KXGS motifs leading to MT destabilization. In vitro kinase assays and metabolic-labeling experiments in living cells confirmed MARK1 as an LRRK2 substrate. Moreover, we also showed that LRRK2 and MARK1 are interacting in eukaryotic cells. Our findings contribute to the identification of physiologic LRRK2 substrates and point to a potential mechanism explaining the reported effects of LRRK2 on neurite morphology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据