4.7 Article

Sex-biased miRNAs of yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) and their potential role in reproductive development

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 485, 期 -, 页码 73-80

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.11.020

关键词

miRNA; Yellow catfish; Small RNA sequencing; Reproductive development; Sex determination

资金

  1. Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute Foundation [HSY201505]
  2. National Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2016045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yellow catfish has been used as an important model to investigate sex differentiation and gonad development. miRNAs have been reported to play an important role in reproduction system. In this study, we conducted RNA-sequencing based miRNAs analysis of yellow catfish gonads at three different ages. We have totally identified 300 miRNAs. Of these miRNAs, 242 miRNAs were conserved in miRBase, while the other 58 miRNAs were firstly identified in our study. A total of 37, 72 and 87 miRNAs were identified as sexually differentially expressed miRNAs in one-year, two-year and three-year old yellow catfish, respectively. Eleven miRNAs appeared to be stably male-biased expressed in three ages, including miR-9-3p, miR-103b-3p, miR-7b, miR-205a-5p, miR-200b3p, miR-200a, miR-150-3p, let-7i-5p, let-7g-5p, let-7h-5p and miR-30d-5p. Two novel miRNAs, novel_77 and novel_ 147, firstly identified in our study, had significantly up-regulated in ovaries through three different ages, which may be new biomarkersfor female gonad development. KEGG pathway annotation and enrichment analysis further illustrated their important roles in several reproductive pathways. Seven most significantly expressed miRNAs were verified by qPCR. Our work identified a set of sex-biased miRNAs that might be potential regulatory factors in gonad development of yellow catfish, which provides new insight to further understand the role of miRNAs in sex determination and differentiation of this economically valuable species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据