4.7 Article

A facile preparation of TiO2/ACF with C-Ti bond and abundant hydroxyls and its enhanced photocatalytic activity for formaldehyde removal

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 608-616

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.209

关键词

Photocatalysis; Formaldehyde; C-Ti bond; Surface hydroxyls; TiO2/ACF

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program - MOST [2013CB933103]
  2. Program for the Fundamental Research - Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovations Council of China [JSF201006300047A, JC201105201126A, ZDSY20120619140933512]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quantum yields and efficiency(ACF) was prepared via a modified deposition-precipitation method to facilitate its photon absorption and of photogenerated charge carriers have been the major issues for photocatalysis on titania catalyst. The TiO2/ACF catalyst with anatase TiO2 uniformly dispersed on activated carbon fibers electron transfer, thus improve the quantum yields and efficiency of the photogenerated electrons and holes. XPS analysis on the catalyst demonstrates the existence of Ti3+ and Ti2+ species, C-Ti bond and abundant hydroxyls, which are also proved by UV-vis DRS and TG-DSC analysis. It is believed that the acid environment in preparation plays an essential role in the formation of C-Ti bond and surface hydroxyls, which can be tuned by changing hydrothermal synthesis time. The C-Ti bond can improve the electron transfer in the catalyst and the substantial surface hydroxyls lead to high absorption for UV lines and enhanced adsorption of water and formaldehyde, resulting in more active OH free radicals and the outstanding photocatalytic activity of TiO2/ACF, which is much higher than the titania powder for photocatalytic removal of low concentration formaldehyde. The essential role of surface hydroxyls for photocatalytic activity was confirmed surpassing that of chemical bond between carbon and titanium in TiO2-carbon composite for the first time. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据