4.7 Article

Selective hydrogenation of phenol to cyclohexanone over Pd@CN (N-doped porous carbon): Role of catalyst reduction method

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 649-655

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.181

关键词

Phenol; Selective hydrogenation; Cyclohexanone; Reduction method; Pd@CN

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFB0301503]
  2. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [BK20150044]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [91534110]
  4. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [BK20160978]
  5. Foundation from State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering of China [ZK201402, ZK201407]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective phenol hydrogenation is a green and sustainable technology to produce cyclohexanone. The work focused on investigating the role of catalyst reduction method in the liquid-phase phenol hydrogenation to cyclohexanone over Pd@CN (N-doped porous carbon). A series of reduction methods including flowing hydrogen reduction, in-situ reaction reduction and liquid-phase reduction were designed and performed. The results highlighted that the reduction method significantly affected the catalytic performance of Pd@CN in the liquid-phase hydrogenation of phenol to cyclohexanone, and the liquid-phase reduction with the addition of appropriate amount of phenol was highly efficient to improve the catalytic activity of Pd@CN. The influence mechanism was explored by a series of characterizations. The results of TEM, XPS and CO chemisorption confirmed that the reduction method mainly affected the size, surface composition and dispersion of Pd in the CN material. The addition of phenol during the liquid-phase reduction could inhibit the aggregation of Pd NPs and promote the reduction of Pd (2+), and then improved the catalytic activity of Pd@CN. The work would aid the development of high-performance Pd@CN catalysts for selective phenol hydrogenation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据