4.7 Article

Constructing of hierarchical yolk-shell structure Li4Ti5O12-SnO2 composites for high rate lithium ion batteries

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 448, 期 -, 页码 389-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.140

关键词

Li4Ti5O12-SnO2 composites; Yolk-shell structure; Capacity; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51272147]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502165, 51702193]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2015JM5208]
  4. Graduate Innovation Found of Shaanxi University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High performance Li-ion batteries require materials with well-designed and controlled structures on nano and micrometre scales, and electrochemical properties can be enhanced by manipulating structure and morphology. Here a hierarchical yolk-shell structure Li4Ti5O12-SnO2 (LTO-SnO2) composites for application of lithium-ion batteries are successfully prepared by controlling the reaction temperature of hydrothermal process. The experimental results demonstrate that the LTO-SnO2 composites prepared at 130 degrees C (Marked as LS-130) have a well hierarchical yolk-shell structure and a good electrochemical property. The LS-130 electrode exhibits the first discharge specific capacity of 556.4 mAh g(-1) at 1 C, and a stable capacity of 253.2 mAh g(-1) still maintained even after 200 cycles. Moreover, when the current rate increase to 10 C, the average discharge specific capacities of LS-130 electrode also show 154.6 mAh g(-1), indicating an excellent rate performance. The excellent electrochemical performance is mainly ascribed to the stability of unique yolk-shell structure and composition involved with the numerous ultrathin LTO nanosheets. The work described here shows that the hierarchical yolk-shell structure LTO-SnO2 composite is a promising anode material for high power and long life lithium ion batteries. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据