4.7 Article

Temperature and nutrients as drivers of microbially mediated arsenic oxidation and removal from acid mine drainage

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 5, 页码 2413-2424

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8716-4

关键词

Acid mine drainage; Arsenic and iron oxidation; Bacterial community; Temperature; Nutrient

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de Recherche (ANR) as part of ANR IngECOST-DMA project [ANR-13-ECOT-0009]
  2. OSU OREME
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-ECOT-0009] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial oxidation of iron (Fe) and arsenic (As) followed by their co-precipitation leads to the natural attenuation of these elements in As-rich acid mine drainage (AMD). The parameters driving the activity and diversity of bacterial communities responsible for this mitigation remain poorly understood. We conducted batch experiments to investigate the effect of temperature (20 vs 35 A degrees C) and nutrient supply on the rate of Fe and As oxidation and precipitation, the bacterial diversity (high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene), and the As oxidation potential (quantification of aioA gene) in AMD from the CarnoulSs mine (France). In batch incubated at 20 A degrees C, the dominance of iron-oxidizing bacteria related to Gallionella spp. was associated with almost complete iron oxidation (98%). However, negligible As oxidation led to the formation of As(III)-rich precipitates. Incubation at 35 A degrees C and nutrient supply both stimulated As oxidation (71-75%), linked to a higher abundance of aioA gene and the dominance of As-oxidizing bacteria related to Thiomonas spp. As a consequence, As(V)-rich precipitates (70-98% of total As) were produced. Our results highlight strong links between indigenous bacterial community composition and iron and arsenic removal efficiency within AMD and provide new insights for the future development of a biological treatment of As-rich AMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据