4.7 Article

Performance studies of water-based drilling fluid for drilling through hydrate bearing sediments

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 211-220

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.11.014

关键词

Water-based drilling fluid; Gas hydrates; Rheology; Inhibition; Carboxymethyl cellulose; Artificial seawater

资金

  1. Earth System Science Organization, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India [MoES/36/OOIS/Extra/65/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrate-bearing formation is a highly unconsolidated formation and being fragile, the hydrates get readily decomposed while drilling through it. To successfully drill through the hydrates, the drilling fluid should have low mud invasion, exhibit optimum properties for wellbore stability, prevent the formation of the hydrates in the annulus, choke lines, etc. Initial experiments were performed with the drilling fluid with the composition as artificial seawater, 3.0 wt% bentonite, 3.0 wt% barite, and 0.3 wt% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (wt%). The rheological, filtration and gelling properties were determined. The synergistic effects of xanthan gum (XG) and CMC with different compositions were used to study rheological properties. The drilling fluid with desirable rheological properties was further studied at low temperatures and at high pressures. The drilling fluid was tested for hydrate inhibiting properties in a high-pressure autoclave vessel at 16.55 MPa and at 0 degrees C and further tested with increasing water cut at both static and dynamic conditions. The experimental results reveal that XG has better viscosifying properties while CMC has a better filtration loss properties. With the increase in the concentration of the both CMC and XG, there has been an increase in viscosity, yield point, gel strength and decrease in the filtration loss. The experimental results also show that the developed drilling fluid has good inhibiting properties under static conditions but with an increase in water cut the risk of formation of hydrates increases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据