4.6 Review Book Chapter

The Genetics of Pain: Implications for Therapeutics

期刊

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010617-052554

关键词

monogenic pain disorders; genome-wide association study; analgesic development; mouse pain models

资金

  1. Arthritis Research UK [20200] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F000227/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [G9717869, G0901905] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Versus Arthritis [20200] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Wellcome Trust [200183/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Medline
  6. BBSRC [BB/F000227/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [G1100340, G9717869, G0901905] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F000227/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G9717869, G1100340, G0901905] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Versus Arthritis [20200] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Wellcome Trust [200183/Z/15/Z, 101054/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pain is an increasing clinical challenge affecting about half the population, with a substantial number of people suffering daily intense pain. Such suffering can be linked to the dramatic rise in opioid use and associated deaths in the United States. There is a pressing need for new analgesics with limited side effects. Here, we summarize what we know about the genetics of pain and implications for drug development. We make the case that chronic pain is not one but a set of disease states, with peripheral drive a key element in most. We argue that understanding redundancy and plasticity, hallmarks of the nervous system, is critical in developing analgesic drug strategies. We describe the exploitation of monogenic pain syndromes and genetic association studies to define analgesic targets, as well as issues associated with animal models of pain. We appraise present-day screening technologies and describe recent approaches to pain treatment that hold promise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据