4.5 Review

Targeting the unfolded protein response for disease intervention

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 1203-1218

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1053869

关键词

endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling.; pharmacological modulator; protein misfolding disorders; unfolded protein response

资金

  1. Biomedical Neurosciences Institute
  2. Fundacion COPEC-UC
  3. FONDECYT [1140549]
  4. Millennium Institute [P09-015-F]
  5. Ring Initiative [ACT1109]
  6. FONDEF [D11I1007, 1150608]
  7. CONICYT [USA 2013-0003]
  8. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson Research
  9. Frick Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) generates a stress condition that engages the unfolded protein response (UPR). The UPR is an adaptive reaction that aims to reestablish ER proteostasis by recovering the folding capacity of the cell. However, chronic ER stress results in apoptosis. Areas covered: This review focuses on discussing the emerging role of the UPR as a driver of several human pathologies including diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. The involvement of specific UPR signaling components on different diseases is highlighted based on preclinical models and pharmacological and genetic manipulation of the pathway. Expert opinion: Therapeutic strategies directed to regulate the activity of different UPR signaling arms may reduce stress levels with a therapeutic gain. Recent drug discovery efforts have identified small molecules that target specific UPR components, providing protection on various disease models. However, important side effects are predicted in the chronic administration due to the fundamental role of the UPR in highly secretory organs such as liver and pancreas. To overcome these problems, we propose the use of combinatorial treatments of selected drugs with natural compounds that are known to modulate the ER proteostasis network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据