4.8 Article

Direct Detection of Small & IT;n & IT;-Alkanes at Sub-ppbv Level by Photoelectron-Induced O-2(+) Cation Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry at kPa Pressure

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 90, 期 8, 页码 5398-5404

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00595

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Special Fund for Development of Major Research Equipment and Instrument [2011YQ05006904]
  2. NSF of China [21375129, 21675155]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct mass spectrometric measurements of saturated hydrocarbons, especially small n-alkanes, remains a great challenge because of low basicity and lack of ionizable functional groups. In this work, a novel high-pressure photoelectron-induced O-2(+) cation chemical ionization source (HPPI-OCI) at kPa based on a 10.6 eV krypton lamp was developed for a time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOFMS). High-intensity O-2(+) reactant ions were generated by photo-electron ionization of air molecules in the double electric field ionization region. The quasi-molecular ions, [M-H](+), of C3-C6 n-alkanes, gradually dominated in the mass spectra when the ion source pressure was elevated from 88 to 1080 Pa, with more than 3 orders of magnitude improvement in signal intensity. As a result, the achieved limits of detection were lowered to 0.14, 0.11, 0.07, and 0.1 ppbv for propane, n-butane, n-pentane, and n-hexane, respectively. The performance of the HPPI-OCI TOFMS was first demonstrated by analysis of exhaled small n-alkanes from healthy smokers and nonsmokers. Then the concentration variations of exhaled small n-alkanes of four healthy volunteers were analyzed after alcohol consumption to explore the alcohol-hepatoxicity-related oxidative stress. In summary, this work provides new insights for controlling the O-2(+)-participating chemical ionization by adjusting the ion source pressure and develops a novel direct mass spectrometric method for sensitive measurements of mall n-alkanes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据