Meaningful Change Scores in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The anchor-based minimal important change, based on receiver operating characteristic analysis or predictive modeling, may need to be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients

(2017) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Examining the Minimal Important Difference of Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Individuals with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Model Using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

(2016) Kathryn A.G. Mills et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties

(2016) N.J. Collins et al.   OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE

When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time

(2016) Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Proportion of Patients Reporting Acceptable Symptoms or Treatment Failure and Their Associated KOOS Values at 6 to 24 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

(2015) Lina H. Ingelsrud et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis

(2015) Berend Terluin et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Minimally important change values of a measurement instrument depend more on baseline values than on the type of intervention

(2015) Henrica C.W. de Vet et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Reliability and Clinically Important Improvement Thresholds for Osteoarthritis Pain and Function Scales: A Multicenter Study

(2014) J. A. Singh et al.   JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY

Associations between inadequate knee function detected by KOOS and prospective graft failure in an anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee

(2014) Lars-Petter Granan et al.   KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Changes for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in Subjects Undergoing Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty

(2013) Marco Monticone et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION

Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods

(2011) Lori D McLeod et al.   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods

(2011) Madeleine T King   Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods

(2009) Caroline B. Terwee et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Cross-cultural comparison of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction in the United States and Norway

(2009) Robert A. Magnussen et al.   KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY

Development of a National Cruciate Ligament Surgery Registry

(2007) Lars-Petter Granan et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY