4.6 Article

An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 216-224

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kidney Health Australia
  2. University of Sydney Postgraduate Award
  3. Ramsay Health Care Foundation Top-Up Scholarship
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship [1106716]
  5. Australian NHMRC Fellowship [1054216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) empowers patients to consider and communicate their current and future treatment goals. However, it can be an emotionally charged process for patients with kidney disease and their caregivers. This study aimed to describe the perspectives and attitudes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and their caregivers toward ACP. Study Design: Qualitative study. Setting & Participants: Patients with ESRD (n=24) and their caregivers (n=15) aged 36 to 91 years at various stages of ACP (not commenced, in progress, or completed)from 3 r enal services. Methodology: Semistructured interviews. Analytical Approach: Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: 5 major themes were identified: articulating core values (avoiding futile and undignified treatment, reevaluating terms of dialysis, framing a life worth living, and refusing to be a burden), confronting conversations (signifying death and defeat, accepting inevitable death, and alleviating existential tension), negotiating mutual understanding (broaching taboos and assisting conflicted caregivers), challenging patient autonomy (family pressures to continue dialysis, grief diminishing caregivers' capacity, and leveraging support), and decisional disempowerment (lacking medical transparency and disappointment with clinical disinterest). Limitations: Only English-speaking patients/caregivers participated in the interview. Conclusions: ACP provides patients with ESRD and their caregivers a conduit for accepting and planning for impending death and to express treatment preferences based on self-dignity and value of living. However, ACP can be considered taboo, may require caregivers to overcome personal and decisional conflict, and may be complex if patients and caregivers are unable to accept the reality of the patient's illness. We suggest that ACP facilitators and clinicians make ACP more acceptable and less confrontational to patients and caregivers and that strategies be put in place to support caregivers who may be experiencing overwhelming grief or who have conflicting goals, particularly when they are called on to make end-of-life decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据