4.7 Review

Nanoplasmonic sensors for detecting circulating cancer biomarkers

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 48-77

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.12.004

关键词

Circulating tumor cells; microRNA; Circulating tumor DNA; Exosomes; Nanoplasmonics; SERS; LSPR

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2016R1A2B4007209]
  2. National Research Foundation of Singapore through a Competitive Research Programme grant [NRF-CRP10-2012-07]
  3. National Research Foundation of Singapore through a Proof-of-Concept grant [NRF2015NRF-POC0001-19]
  4. National Research Foundation of Singapore through the Centre for Precision Biology at Nanyang Technological University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of cancer biomarkers represents an important aspect of cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Recently, the concept of liquid biopsy has been introduced whereby diagnosis and prognosis are performed by means of analyzing biological fluids obtained from patients to detect and quantify circulating cancer biomarkers. Unlike conventional biopsy whereby primary tumor cells are analyzed, liquid biopsy enables the detection of a wide variety of circulating cancer biomarkers, including microRNA (miRNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), proteins, exosomes and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Among the various techniques that have been developed to detect circulating cancer biomarkers, nanoplasmonic sensors represent a promising measurement approach due to high sensitivity and specificity as well as ease of instrumentation and operation. In this review, we discuss the relevance and applicability of three different categories of nanoplasmonic sensing techniques, namely surface plasmon resonance (SPR), localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), for the detection of different classes of circulating cancer biomarkers. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据