4.1 Article

Acute changes of hip joint range of motion using selected clinical stretching procedures: A randomized crossover study

期刊

MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 70-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.011

关键词

Hip adductor flexibility; Maximal voluntary contraction; Stretching intensity; Warm-up procedures

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Hip adductor flexibility and strength is an important component of athletic performance and many activities of daily living. Little research has been done on the acute effects of a single session of stretching on hip abduction range of motion (ROM). Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare 3 clinical stretching procedures against passive static stretching and control on ROM and peak isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Design: Using a randomized crossover study design, a total of 40 participants (20 male and 20 female) who had reduced hip adductor muscle length attended a familiarization session and 5 testing sessions on non-consecutive days. Method: Following the warm-up and pre-intervention measures of ROM and MVC, participants were randomly assigned 1 of 3 clinical stretching procedures (modified lunge, multidirectional, and joint mobilization) or a static stretch or control condition. Post-intervention measures of ROM and MVC were taken immediately following completion of the assigned condition. Results: An ANOVA using a repeated measure design with the change score was conducted. All interventions resulted in small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases (1.0 degrees-1.7 degrees) in ROM with no inter-condition differences except one. Multidirectional stretching was greater than control (p = 0.031). Conclusions: These data suggest that a single session of stretching has only a minimal effect on acute changes of hip abduction ROM. Although hip abduction is a frontal plane motion, to effectively increase the extensibility of the structures that limit abduction, integrating multi-planar stretches may be indicated. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据