4.6 Article

Identifying land suitable for agricultural land reform using GIS-MCDA in South Africa

期刊

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 2281-2299

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-017-9989-6

关键词

Land reform; GIS-MCDA; Agriculture; Sustainable; South Africa; Land suitability; Strategically located land

资金

  1. University of Johannesburg, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land reform is identified as a key tool in fostering development in South Africa. Twenty years after the advent of democracy in South Africa, the land question remains a critical issue for policy makers. Several frameworks have been put in place by the government to identify land that is strategically located for land reform. However, many of these frameworks are not well aligned and not objective in defining strategically located land for land reform and often lead to unsustainable land use management practices. This has hampered the government's land reform initiative in promoting agricultural land reform and food security. Accordingly, there is a need to develop a decisionsupport tool that facilitates the identification of strategically located land for land reform. This study proposes the use of geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to develop a strategically located land index (SLLI) to identify land suitable for agricultural land reform. Participatory workshops and the group analytical hierarchy process were utilised to identify and weigh criteria used in computing the SLLI. The results indicate that land that is suitable for agricultural land reform is scarce, and there are also competing needs on the highly suitable land for agriculture. The study demonstrates that GIS and MCDA are invaluable tools in facilitating evidence-based decision-making for land reform and sustainable land use management practices. The SLLI is not the panacea to land identification; there is also need to appreciate the contested nature of land in South Africa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据