4.4 Article

A bifunctional cellulase-xylanase of a new Chryseobacterium strain isolated from the dung of a straw-fed cattle

期刊

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 381-398

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201503137]
  2. Financial Innovative Improvement Project of Sichuan Province [2017LWJJ-007, 2016ZYPZ-028]
  3. Special Fund of Sichuan Province for Strategic Emerging Industry Development [SC2013510104007]
  4. Positional Expert Project by Ministry of Agriculture for National Technological System of Edible Fungi Industry [CARS-24]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new cellulolytic strain of Chryseobacterium genus was screened from the dung of a cattle fed with cereal straw. A putative cellulase gene (cbGH5) belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 5 subfamily 46 (GH5_46) was identified and cloned by degenerate PCR plus genome walking. The CbGH5 protein was overexpressed in Pichia pastoris, purified and characterized. It is the first bifunctional cellulase-xylanase reported in GH5_46 as well as in Chryseobacterium genus. The enzyme showed an endoglucanase activity on carboxymethylcellulose of 3237molmin(-1)mg(-1) at pH 9, 90 degrees C and a xylanase activity on birchwood xylan of 1793mol min(-1)mg(-1) at pH 8, 90 degrees C. The activity level and thermophilicity are in the front rank of all the known cellulases and xylanases. Core hydrophobicity had a positive effect on the thermophilicity of this enzyme. When similar quantity of enzymatic activity units was applied on the straws of wheat, rice, corn and oilseed rape, CbGH5 could obtain 3.5-5.0x glucose and 1.2-1.8x xylose than a mixed commercial cellulase plus xylanase of Novozymes. When applied on spent mushroom substrates made from the four straws, CbGH5 could obtain 9.2-15.7x glucose and 3.5-4.3x xylose than the mixed Novozymes cellulase+xylanase. The results suggest that CbGH5 could be a promising candidate for industrial lignocellulosic biomass conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据