4.5 Article

Myeloperoxidase targets oxidative host attacks to Salmonella and prevents collateral tissue damage

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.268

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Foundation [310030_156818, PZ00P3_142403, PP00P3_144863]
  2. Gebert Ruf Foundation [GRS 058/14]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_142403, PP00P3_144863, 310030_156818] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host control of infections crucially depends on the capability to kill pathogens with reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, these toxic molecules can also readily damage host components and cause severe immunopathology. Here, we show that neutrophils use their most abundant granule protein, myeloperoxidase, to target ROS specifically to pathogens while minimizing collateral tissue damage. A computational model predicted that myeloperoxidase efficiently scavenges diffusible H2O2 at the surface of phagosomal Salmonella and converts it into highly reactive HOCl ( bleach), which rapidly damages biomolecules within a radius of less than 0.1 mu m. Myeloperoxidase-deficient neutrophils were predicted to accumulate large quantities of H2O2 that still effectively kill Salmonella, but most H2O2 would leak from the phagosome. Salmonella stimulation of neutrophils from normal and myeloperoxidase-deficient human donors experimentally confirmed an inverse relationship between myeloperoxidase activity and extracellular H2O2 release. Myeloperoxidase-deficient mice infected with Salmonella had elevated hydrogen peroxide tissue levels and exacerbated oxidative damage of host lipids and DNA, despite almost normal Salmonella control. These data show that myeloperoxidase has a major function in mitigating collateral tissue damage during antimicrobial oxidative bursts, by converting diffusible long-lived H2O2 into highly reactive, microbicidal and locally confined HOCl at pathogen surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据