4.7 Article

Effect of CT image size and resolution on the accuracy of rock property estimates

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 122, 期 5, 页码 3635-3647

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JB013575

关键词

statistically representative volume; transport properties of the rock; topology and geometry of the pore space

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-05-01310, 15-55-20004, 16-05-00800]
  2. Curtin Reservoir Geophysics Consortium (CRGC)
  3. Australian Federal Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to study the effect of the micro-CT scan resolution and size on the accuracy of upscaled digital rock property estimation of core samples Bentheimer sandstone images with the resolution varying from 0.9m to 24m are used. We statistically show that the correlation length of the pore-to-matrix distribution can be reliably determined for the images with the resolution finer than 9 voxels per correlation length and the representative volume for this property is about 15(3) correlation length. Similar resolution values for the statistically representative volume are also valid for the estimation of the total porosity, specific surface area, mean curvature, and topology of the pore space. Only the total porosity and the number of isolated pores are stably recovered, whereas geometry and the topological measures of the pore space are strongly affected by the resolution change. We also simulate fluid flow in the pore space and estimate permeability and tortuosity of the sample. The results demonstrate that the representative volume for the transport property calculation should be greater than 50 correlation lengths of pore-to-matrix distribution. On the other hand, permeability estimation based on the statistical analysis of equivalent realizations shows some weak influence of the resolution on the transport properties. The reason for this might be that the characteristic scale of the particular physical processes may affect the result stronger than the model (image) scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据