4.7 Article

Development and weatherability of bio-based composites of structural quality using flax fiber and epoxidized sucrose soyate

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 113, 期 -, 页码 17-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.002

关键词

Biocomposites; Degrading; Natural fibers; Natural resins; Weathering

资金

  1. National Science Foundation through SMM grant [CMMI-1130590]
  2. National Science Foundation through EPSCoR grant [EPS-0814442]
  3. Office of Integrative Activities
  4. Office Of The Director [1355466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composites having high bio-based content with properties and costs rivaling those consisting of synthetic constituents are a goal of much current research. The obviousmaterial choices -vegetable oil based resins and natural fibers -present the challenges of poor resin properties and weak fiber/matrix bonding, respectively. Conventional methods of overcoming poor resin quality involve the incorporation of additives, which dilute the resulting composite's bio-content and increases cost. To overcome these limitations while maintaining high bio-content, in this study, a newly developed biobased resin, epoxidized sucrose soyate (ESS), is combined with surface-treated flax fiber to produce novel bio-composites. Properties of manufactured composites were compared against those using epoxy resin reinforced with flax fiber. In addition to mechanical property evaluation, accelerated weathering was performed on the manufactured composites to evaluate the mechanical properties after exposing to UV and moisture. The results of this study revealed the successful production of biocomposites having properties that meet or exceed those of conventional pultruded members while having 85% bio-content. Moreover, composites using treated flax fiber and ESS resin showed less degradation in properties and appearance after accelerated weathering exposure. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据