4.6 Article

Narcolepsy

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS
卷 3, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.100

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  4. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Emil Aaltonen Foundation
  7. Paivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation
  8. Orion Farmos Research Foundation
  9. Instrumentarium Science Foundation
  10. Lundbeck Foundation [R105-2011-9362] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Narcolepsy is a chronic sleep disorder that has a typical onset in adolescence and is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, which can have severe consequences for the patient. Problems faced by patients with narcolepsy include social stigma associated with this disease, difficulties in obtaining an education and keeping a job, a reduced quality of life and socioeconomic consequences. Two subtypes of narcolepsy have been described (narcolepsy type 1 and narcolepsy type 2), both of which have similar clinical profiles, except for the presence of cataplexy, which occurs only in patients with narcolepsy type 1. The pathogenesis of narcolepsy type 1 is hypothesized to be the autoimmune destruction of the hypocretin-producing neurons in the hypothalamus; this hypothesis is supported by immune-related genetic and environmental factors associated with the disease. However, direct evidence in support of the autoimmune hypothesis is currently unavailable. Diagnosis of narcolepsy encompasses clinical, electrophysiological and biological evaluations, but simpler and faster procedures are needed. Several medications are available for the symptomatic treatment of narcolepsy, all of which have quite good efficacy and safety profiles. However, to date, no treatment hinders or slows disease development. Improved diagnostic tools and increased understanding of the pathogenesis of narcolepsy type 1 are needed and might lead to therapeutic or even preventative interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据