4.3 Article

Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 Pathway in Creating an Immunosuppressive Microenvironment and in Initiation and Progression of Wilms' Tumor

期刊

NEOPLASIA
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 237-249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.07.009

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health [CA34936, DK069599]
  2. State of Texas CPRIT [RP100329, RP110324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wilms' tumors (WT), which accountfor 6% of all childhood cancers, arise from dysregulated differentiation of nephrogenic progenitor cells from embryonic kidneys. Though there is an improvement in the prognosis of WT, still 10% of patients withWTdie due to recurrence. Thusmore effective treatment approaches are necessary. We previously characterized the inflammatorymicroenvironment in humanWT and observed the robust expressionof COX-2. The aimof this studywas to extend our studies to analyze the role of COX-2 pathway components in WT progression using a mouse model of WT. Herein, COX-2 pathway components such as COX-2, HIF1-alpha, p-ERK1/2, and p-STAT3 were upregulated in mouse and human tumor tissues. In ourRPPA analysis, COX-2 was up-regulated inM15 cells afterWt1 gene was knocked down. Flow cytometry analysis showed the increased infiltration of immune suppressive inflammatory cells such as pDC's and Treg cells in tumors. The chemotactic chemokines responsible for the infiltration of these cells were also induced in CCR5 and CXCR4 dependent manner respectively. The immunosuppressive cytokines IL-10, TGF-a, and TNF-a were also upregulated. Furthermore, more pronounced Th2 and Treg induced cytokine response was observed than Th1 response in tumors. Basing on all these evidences it is speculated that COX-2 pathwaymay be a beneficial target for the treatment of WT. Itmay bemost effective as an adjuvant therapy together with other inhibitors. Thus, our current study provides a good rationale for initiating animal studies to confirm the efficacy of COX-2 inhibitors in decreasing tumor cell growth in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据