4.6 Article

Using nonparametric modeling approaches and remote sensing imagery to estimate ecological welfare forest biomass

期刊

JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 151-161

出版社

NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-017-0404-9

关键词

Above ground biomass; Ecological forest; Forest management; Landsat; Random forest

类别

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection [STSN-05-11]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2015BAC02B00]
  3. Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2015F50056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial distribution of forest biomass is closely related with carbon cycle, climate change, forest productivity, and biodiversity. Efficient quantification of biomass provides important information about forest quality and health. With the rising awareness of sustainable development, the ecological benefits of forest biomass attract more attention compared to traditional wood supply function. In this study, two nonparametric modeling approaches, random forest (RF) and support vector machine were adopted to estimate above ground biomass (AGB) using widely used Landsat imagery in the region, especially within the ecological forest of Fuyang District in Zhejiang Province, China. Correlation analysis was accomplished and model parameters were optimized during the modeling process. As a result, the best performance modeling method RF was implemented to produce an AGB estimation map. The predicted map of AGB in the study area showed obvious spatial variability and demonstrated that within the current ecological forest zone, as well as the protected areas, the average of AGB were higher than the ordinary forest. The quantification of AGB was proven to have a close relationship with the local forest policy and management pattern, which indicated that combining remote-sensing imagery and forest biophysical property would provide considerable guidance for making beneficial decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据