4.5 Article

On the optimal design of forward osmosis desalination systems with NH3-CO2-H2O solutions

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ew00037e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (KTI) within the SCCER-EIP (Swiss Competence Center for Energy Research - Efficiency of Industrial Processes) [1155000150]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane-based forward osmosis, especially when NH3-CO2-H2O mixtures are adopted as draw solutions, is a promising new process for clean water production, including seawater desalination and wastewater treatment. In such a process, water is first removed from the feed (e.g. seawater) by exploiting the osmotic pressure difference between the feed and the draw solution, which are at the two sides of the membrane; in a second step, drinkable water is produced by treating the water-rich draw solution in a distillation column. Accordingly, the main energy requirement is thermal energy for the reboiler. In order to enable a robust performance evaluation of forward osmosis systems, developing a comprehensive simulation framework that couples a rigorous distillation model and a reliable thermodynamic model for electrolyte solutions with an optimization routine is needed. With this work, we aim at satisfying this need by providing (i) a comprehensive analysis of forward osmosis-based systems, with special emphasis on the recovery of the draw solution and the connected energy demand, and (ii) a systematic approach to the design and operation of such processes. Ternary phase diagrams of NH3-CO2-H2O are used to characterize the system in terms of osmotic pressure, thermal separation energy and pressure in the distillation column. An optimization routine is then developed to minimize the equivalent energy and the membrane area specific to the water produced: different Pareto curves along with the associated trends in the design variables are identified and explained. Finally, forward osmosis is compared to reverse osmosis and thermal desalination plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据