4.7 Article

Biological Fate of Fe3O4 Core-Shell Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Depending on Particle Surface Chemistry

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano7070162

关键词

nanoparticles; surface coating; cell-membrane interactions; biodistribution; safety

资金

  1. French national research agency [ANR-13-NANO-0007, ANR-10-INBS-05]
  2. Chercheur d'Avenir Languedoc Roussillon
  3. French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (FRISBI)
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-NANO-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biological fate of nanoparticles (NPs) for biomedical applications is highly dependent of their size and charge, their aggregation state and their surface chemistry. The chemical composition of the NPs surface influences their stability in biological fluids, their interaction with proteins, and their attraction to the cell membranes. In this work, core-shell magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Fe3O4@ MSN), that are considered as potential theranostic candidates, are coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC) lipid bilayer. Their biological fate is studied in comparison to the native NPs. The physicochemical properties of these three types of NPs and their suspension behavior in different media are investigated. The attraction to a membrane model is also evaluated using a supported lipid bilayer. The surface composition of NPs strongly influences their dispersion in biological fluids mimics, protein binding and their interaction with cell membrane. While none of these types of NPs is found to be toxic on mice four days after intravenous injection of a dose of 40 mg kg(-1) of NPs, their surface coating nature influences the in vivo biodistribution. Importantly, NP coated with DMPC exhibit a strong accumulation in liver and a very low accumulation in lung in comparison with nude or PEG ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据