4.4 Article

Analysis of Termination of Transcription Using BrUTP-strand-specific Transcription Run-on (TRO) Approach

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/55446

关键词

Genetics; Issue 121; TRO; termination of transcription; readthrough transcription; RNA polymerase II; yeast; in vivo

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB 1020911]
  2. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1020911] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This manuscript describes a protocol for detecting transcription termination defect in vivo. The strand-specific TRO protocol using BrUTP described here is a powerful experimental approach for analyzing the transcription termination defect under physiological conditions. Like the traditional TRO assay, it relies on the presence of a transcriptionally active polymerase beyond the 3' end of the gene as an indicator of a transcription termination defect(1). It overcomes two major problems encountered with the traditional TRO assay. First, it can detect if the polymerase reading through the termination signal is the one that initiated transcription from the promoter-proximal region, or if it is simply representing a pervasively transcribing polymerase that initiated non-specifically from somewhere in the body or the 3' end of the gene. Secondly, it can distinguish if the transcriptionally active polymerase signal beyond the terminator region is truly the readthrough sense mRNA transcribing polymerase or a terminator-initiated non-coding anti-sense RNA signal. Briefly, the protocol involves permeabilizing the exponentially growing yeast cells, allowing the transcripts that initiated in vivo to elongate in the presence of the BrUTP nucleotide, purifying BrUTP-labelled RNA by the affinity approach, reverse transcribing the purified nascent RNA and amplifying the cDNA using strand-specific primers flanking the promoter and the terminator regions of the gene(2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据