4.4 Article

Retrospective Evaluation of a Teleretinal Screening Program in Detecting Multiple Nondiabetic Eye Diseases

期刊

TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 42-49

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0039

关键词

telemedicine; teleophthalmology; teleretinal; ocular screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diabetic teleretinal screening programs have been utilized successfully across the world to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and are well validated. Less information, however, exists on the ability of teleretinal imaging to detect nondiabetic ocular pathology. Introduction: This study performed a retrospective evaluation to assess the ability of a community-based diabetic teleretinal screening program to detect common ocular disease other than DR. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review of 1,774 patients who underwent diabetic teleretinal screening was performed. Eye clinic notes from the Veterans Health Administration's electronic medical record, Computerized Patient Record System, were searched for each of the patients screened through teleretinal imaging. When a face-to-face examination note was present, the physical findings were compared to those obtained through teleretinal imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for suspicious nerve, cataract, and age-related macular degeneration. Results: A total of 903 patients underwent a clinical examination. The positive predictive value was highest for cataract (100%), suspicious nerve (93%), and macular degeneration (90%). The negative predictive value and the percent agreement between teleretinal imaging and a clinical examination were over 90% for each disease category. Discussion: A teleretinal imaging protocol may be used to screen for other common ocular diseases. Conclusion: It may be feasible to use diabetic teleretinal photographs to screen patients for other potential eye diseases. Additional elements of the eye workup may be added to enhance accuracy of disease detection. Further study is necessary to confirm this initial retrospective review.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据