4.8 Article

Impacts of surface or interface chemistry of ZnSe passivation layer on the performance of CdS/CdSe quantum dot sensitized solar cells

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 433-440

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.12.047

关键词

Quantum dot sensitized solar cell; ZnSe passivation layer; SILAR immersion sequence; Surface or interface chemistry; Charge recombination

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR 1505902]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. National Natural Science Foundations of China [21377023, 51362026, 21477019]
  4. Division Of Materials Research
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505902] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ZnSe deposited via successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction (SILAR) method onto TiO2/CdS/CdSe photoanode has been proven as an effective passivation layer to suppressing charge recombination and enhancing power conversion efficiency in quantum dot-sensitized solar cells (QDSCs). However, the device performance varies appreciably with the deposition process as the chemical identity and the interfacial structure between the passivation layer and the quantum dots and electrolytes have retained quite some unanswered questions. The present paper reports the significant impacts of ZnSe passivation layer with different surface or interface chemistry on the performance of CdS/CdSe QDSCs. The photovoltaic properties show that the performance of assembled cells has a strong dependence on the SILAR immersion sequences started with Zn2+ or Se2-. When Zn2+ was initially deposited, the unintentionally formed QDs/ZnSe/Se/SeO2 structure with a large amount of ZnSe leads to a significant increase in the photovoltaic properties. When Se2- was first deposited, most of the Se2- absorbed on the surface of the photoanode would be oxidized to form Se-o and SeO2, with a small fraction of ZnSe formed. The resulted QDs/Se/SeO2/ZnSe structure leads to a drastic decrease of the solar cell performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据