4.1 Article

Assessment of long-term cultivated human precision-cut lung slices as an ex vivo system for evaluation of chronic cytotoxicity and functionality

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12995-017-0158-5

关键词

Precision-cut lung slices; PCLS; Long-term cultivation; Bronchoconstriction; Human; Cytokines; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) [HDTRA-12-C-092]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Investigation of basic chronic inflammatory mechanisms and development of new therapeutics targeting the respiratory tract requires appropriate testing systems, including those to monitor long-persistence. Human precision-cut lung slices (PCLS) have been demonstrated to mimic the human respiratory tract and have potential of an alternative, ex-vivo system to replace or augment in-vitro testing and animal models. So far, most research on PCLS has been conducted for short cultivation periods (<= 72 h), while analyses of slowly metabolized therapeutics require long-term survival of PCLS in culture. In the present study, we evaluated viability, physiology and structural integrity of PCLS cultured for up to 15 days. Methods: PCLS were cultured for 15 days and various parameters were assessed at different time points. Results: Structural integrity and viability of cultured PCLS remained constant for 15 days. Moreover, bronchoconstriction was inducible over the whole period of cultivation, though with decreased sensitivity (EC(50)1d = 4 x 10(-8) M vs. EC(50)15d = 4 x 10(-6) M) and reduced maximum of initial airway area (1d = 0.5% vs. 15d = 18.7%). In contrast, even though still clearly inducible compared to medium control, LPS-induced TNF-alpha secretion decreased significantly from day 1 to day 15 of culture. Conclusions: Overall, though long-term cultivation of PCLS need further investigation for cytokine secretion, possibly on a cellular level, PCLS are feasible for bronchoconstriction studies and toxicity assays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据