4.6 Article

Driving electrochemical oxygen reduction and hydrazine oxidation reaction by enzyme-inspired polymeric Cu(3,3′-diaminobenzidine) catalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 33, 页码 17413-17420

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta05183b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province [BK20160028, BK20170084]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675022]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry [SKLEAC201703]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the well-defined molecular structure and tunable mono-, di-or multinuclearity, Cu-N complexes have recently drawn specific attention as emerging catalysts for sustainable electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and other reactions. However, compared to state-of-the-art Pt/C, most of these Cu-based molecular catalysts show low catalytic activity due to the intrinsically limited capability and challenges in electronic structure modulation and sequential electron transfer within a single small molecule. Herein, inspired by structure-property relationships of laccases (a type of macromolecular biological catalyst), we report a facile molecular assembly of Cu(3,3'-diaminobenzidine) polymeric complex on carbon black via Cu-N complexing and p-p interaction as a highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for ORR and hydrazine oxidation reaction (HOR), two half reactions for hydrazine fuel cells. Similar to the function of the Cys-His group in natural laccases, the 3,3'-diaminobenzidine ligand in the proposed polymeric catalyst synergistically adjusted the electronic structure of the Cu-N complex center and mediated a multiple-electron transfer cooperatively with carbon black via a long-range p-p interaction, owing to its electron reservation and p-conjugated properties. This study may provide a new way to design highly efficient biomimetic noble-metal-free electrocatalysts with well-defined and tunable structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据