4.7 Review

Innovative pharmaceutical interventions in cardiovascular disease: Focusing on the contribution of non-HDL-C/LDL-C-lowering versus HDL-C-raising A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant preclinical studies and clinical trials

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 763, 期 -, 页码 48-63

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.089

关键词

Cardiovascular disease; Clinical outcome; Myocardial infarction; LDL-cholesterol; Non-HDL-cholesterol; HDL-cholesterol; Atherosclerosis; Clinical trials; APOE*3Leiden.CETP mice; Mouse; Rabbit; Hamster; Niacin; Fibrates; Glitazones; PPAR agonists; CETP inhibition; SR-BI inhibitor; ABCA1 degradation inhibitors; Reconstituted HDL; Delipidated HDL; Apolipoprotein A-I Milano; Apolipoprotein A-I mimetic; Apolipoprotein A-I inducer; LCAT

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Astellas
  3. Astra-Zeneca
  4. Biotronik
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Daiichi Sankyo
  7. Lilly
  8. Genzyme
  9. Medtronic
  10. Merck-Schering-Plough
  11. Pfizer
  12. Orbus Neich
  13. Novartis
  14. Roche
  15. Servier
  16. Sanofi Aventis
  17. Netherlands Heart Foundation
  18. Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands
  19. European Community Framework KP7 Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-HDL-cholesterol is well recognised as a primary causal risk factor in cardiovascular disease. However, despite consistent epidemiological evidence for an inverse association between HDL-C and corconary heart disease, clinical trials aimed at raising HDL-C (AIM-HIGH, HPS2-THRIVE, dal-OUTCOMES) Failed to meet their primary goals. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of established and novel treatment strategies, specifically targeting HDL, on inhibition of atherosclerosis in cholesteryl ester transfer protein-expressing animals, and the prevention of clinical events in randomised controlled trials. Linear regression analyses using data from preclinical studies revealed associations for TC and non-HDL-C and lesion area (R-2=0.258, P=0.045; R-2=0.760, P<0001), but not for HDL-C (R-2=0.030, P=0.556). In clinical trials, non-fatal myocardial infarction risk was significantly less in the treatment group with pooled odd ratios of 0.87 [0.81; 0.941 for all trials and 0.85 10.78; 0.931 after excluding some trials clue to off-target adverse events, whereas all-cause mortality was not affected (OR 1.05 [0.99-1.10]). Meta-regression analyses revealed a trend towards an association between between-group differences in absolute change from baseline in LDL-C and non-fatal myocardial infarction (P=0.066), whereas no correlation was found for HDL-C (P=0.955). We conclude that the protective role of lowering LDL-C and non-HDL-C is well-established. The contribution of raising HDL-C on inhibition of atherosclerosis and the prevention of cardiovascular disease remains undefined and may be dependent on the mode of action of HDL-C-modification. Nonetheless, treatment strategies aimed at improving HDL function and raising apolipoprotein A-I may be worth exploring. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据