4.6 Article

Molecular Characterization of Extracts from Biorefinery Wastes and Evaluation of Their Plant Biostimulation

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 9023-9031

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01928

关键词

Biorefinery residues; Plant biostimulants; Water-soluble extracts; Humic-like materials; C-13-CPMAS NMR; P-31 NMR; H-1-DOSY NMR; HPSEC; 2-Chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxa-phospholane

资金

  1. MIUR [PON03PE_00107_01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biorefinery residues from non-food biomasses are promising sources of sustainable agrochemicals. The molecular properties of water-soluble extracts from ligno-cellulosic biomass pretreated first by steam-explosion and then by enzymatic hydrolyses at different buffer doses, were assayed for bioactivity on maize. C-13 and P-31 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra showed that extracts varied in phenolic and carboxyl content, while high performance size exclusion chromatography and diffusion ordered spectroscopy NMR revealed that Ox-BYP 1 obtained from wastes treated with a greater buffer dose contained small-sized molecules associated in apparently large metastable aggregates. Ox-BYP 2 separated from wastes treated with smaller buffer concentrations showed a more stable conformation. Both hydrolysates revealed a positive dose-dependent bioactivity toward maize growth. Ox-BYP 1 promoted plant fresh and dry weights and root length at 10 and 100 ppm but decreased seedling growth at 1 ppm. Instead, Ox-BYP 2 increased the whole plant growth at all assayed concentrations. Their different biostimulation effects were attributed to the toxicity of easily bioaccessible lignin-derived phenolics at small concentrations of Ox-BYP 1, which was removed by molecular self assembly at greater concentrations. Conversely, the more strongly associated Ox-BYP 2 exerted a positive bioactivity even at small doses. The bioactivity of extracts from biorefinery wastes appeared to depend on molecular composition and, in turn, on waste pretreatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据