4.6 Article

Supertoughened Polylactide Binary Blend with High Heat Deflection Temperature Achieved by Thermal Annealing above the Glass Transition Temperature

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 480-490

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02751

关键词

Elastomer; Biodegradable; Impact strength; Glass transition temperature; Tensile property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673183, 51473155]
  2. Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through thermal annealing above the glass transition temperature, a supertoughened binary blend with the highest notched Izod impact strength of 98 KJ/m(2) was achieved, which was about 52 times of that of neat polylactide (PLA; 1.9 KJ/m(2)). The binary blend was composed of biocompatible and biodegradable PLA and ethylene-acrylic ester glycidyl methacrylate terpolymer (EGMA) elastomer at the composition of 80/20 PLA/EGMA. For one toughened binary blend with the notched Izod impact strength of 94 KJ/ m(2), its tensile elongation at break was kept above 120%. Moreover, this supertoughened binary blend also displayed a much higher heat deflection temperature for application. Thermal annealing induced crystallization of the PLA matrix in the blend, and a linear correlation between the notched Izod Notched Izod impact strength and crystallinity was revealed. The possible toughening mechanism for the PLA/EGMA 80/20 blend with thermal annealing was analyzed from the viewpoint of negative pressure effects, as imposed on EGMA elastomeric particles during the quench process and thermal annealing thereafter. Decreases of the glass transition temperatures for the EGMA elastomeric particles in the blend were observed for both the quench and thermal annealing processes, which originated from asymmetric thermal shrinkages between the EGMA elastomeric phase and PLA matrix phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据