4.6 Article

Removal of Pharmaceuticals from Wastewater by Intermittent Electrocoagulation

期刊

WATER
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w9020085

关键词

diclofenac (DCF); carbamazepine (CBZ); amoxicillin (AMX); emerging contaminants (ECs); electrochemical processes; current density; electric field

资金

  1. University of Salerno [ORSA167105, ORSA154525]
  2. Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation [EG16MO01]
  3. University of the Philippines-Diliman
  4. Engineering Research and Development for Technology (ERDT) through the Department of Science and Technology-Philippines
  5. Paolo Napodano and Valentina Nobile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continuous release of emerging contaminants (ECs) in the aquatic environment, as a result of the inadequate removal by conventional treatment methods, has prompted research to explore viable solutions to this rising global problem. One promising alternative is the use of electrochemical processes since they represent a simple and highly efficient technology with less footprint. In this paper, the feasibility of treating ECs (i.e., pharmaceuticals) using an intermittent electrocoagulation process, a known electrochemical technology, has been investigated. Diclofenac (DCF), carbamazepine (CBZ) and amoxicillin (AMX) were chosen as being representative of highly consumed drugs that are frequently detected in our water resources and were added in synthetic municipal wastewater. The removal efficiencies of both individual and combined pharmaceuticals were determined under different experimental conditions: hydraulic retention time (HRT) (6, 19 and 38 h), initial concentration (0.01, 4 and 10 mg/L) and intermittent application (5 min ON/20 min OFF) of current density (0.5, 1.15 and 1.8 mA/cm(2)). Results have shown that these parameters have significant effects on pharmaceutical degradation. Maximum removals (DCF = 90%, CBZ = 70% and AMX = 77%) were obtained at a current density of 0.5 mA/cm(2), an initial concentration of 10 mg/L and HRT of 38 h.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据