4.7 Article

Mycobacterium tuberculosis subverts negative regulatory pathways in human macrophages to drive immunopathology

期刊

PLOS PATHOGENS
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006367

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute for Health [R33A1102239]
  2. Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative - seven research councils
  3. Department of Health and Department for Environment Food Rural Affairs [MR/N006631/1]
  4. MRC [MR/N006631/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Cancer Research UK [22100] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/N006631/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tuberculosis remains a global pandemic and drives lung matrix destruction to transmit. Whilst pathways driving inflammatory responses in macrophages have been relatively well described, negative regulatory pathways are less well defined. We hypothesised that Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) specifically targets negative regulatory pathways to augment immunopathology. Inhibition of signalling through the PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 pathway increased matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) gene expression and secretion, a collagenase central to TB pathogenesis, and multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines. In patients with confirmed pulmonary TB, PI3Kd expression was absent within granulomas. Furthermore, Mtb infection suppressed PI3Kd gene expression in macrophages. Interestingly, inhibition of the MNK pathway, downstream of pro-inflammatory p38 and ERK MAPKs, also increased MMP-1 secretion, whilst suppressing secretion of TH1 cytokines. Cross-talk between the PI3K and MNK pathways was demonstrated at the level of eIF4E phosphorylation. Mtb globally suppressed the MMP-inhibitory pathways in macrophages, reducing levels of mRNAs encoding PI3Kd, mTORC-1 and MNK-1 via upregulation of miRNAs. Therefore, Mtb disrupts negative regulatory pathways at multiple levels in macrophages to drive a tissuedestructive phenotype that facilitates transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据