4.6 Article

Effect and function mechanism of sinter basicity on softening-melting behaviors of mixed burden made from chromium-bearing vanadium-titanium magnetite

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 39-47

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-017-3406-z

关键词

blast furnace; sinter basicity; Cr-V-Ti magnetite; softening-melting behaviors; cohesive zone; function mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Fundation of China [51574067]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA062302, 2012AA062304]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N110202001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of sinter basicity on softening-melting behaviors of mixed burden made from chromium-bearing vanadium-titanium magnetite (Cr-V-Ti magnetite) was investigated and the function mechanism was simultaneously analyzed. The results show that with increasing sinter basicity from 1.71 to 2.36, the softening interval tends to increase from 149.3 A degrees C to 181.7 A degrees C while the melting interval tends to decrease from 178.0 A degrees C to 136.7 A degrees C. The location of cohesive zone moves downwards firstly and then ascends slightly, but the cohesive zone becomes thinner. The softening-melting characteristic value becomes small, which indicates that the permeability of burden column is improved. The dripping ratio of mixed burden tends to increase firstly and then decrease, which comes to the highest value of 74.50% when the sinter basicity is 2.13. The content and the recovery of V and Cr in dripping iron are all increased. The generation amount of components with high melting point in slag becomes little with the increase of sinter basicity, which could improve the permeability of mixed burden. Taking softening-melting behaviors of mixed burden and recovery of valuable elements into account, the proper sinter basicity is no less than 2.13 for smelting mixed burden made from Cr-V-Ti magnetite in blast furnace.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据