4.4 Article

Preliminary techno-economic analysis of a multi-bed series reactor as a simultaneous CF4 abatement and utilization process

期刊

GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 542-549

出版社

WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
DOI: 10.1002/ghg.1661

关键词

perfluorinated compounds (PFCs); CF4; multi-bed series reactor; sorption-enhanced reaction; techno-economic analysis

资金

  1. R&D Center for reduction of Non-CO2 Greenhouse gases - Korea Ministry of Environment(MOE) as the Global Top Environment RD Program [RE2015001690003]
  2. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [ARQ201504045002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20153513553] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A preliminary techno-economic analysis combining process simulation and economic analysis has been carried out to assess the feasibility of employing a new CF4 abatement and utilization process without HF effluent, where CaO was employed to convert produced HF into CaF2, a useful chemical. Moreover, the effect of employing multi-bed series reactors compared with a single-bed reactor on CaF2 production was analyzed using Aspen HYSYS (R) based on material and energy balances from process flow diagrams for three systems, a single-bed reactor (S-1), a two-bed series reactor (S-2), and a three-bed series reactor (S-3). From economic analysis to estimate annual operating cost savings for three systems, it was found that multi-bed series reactors (S-2 and S-3) performed better than a single-bed reactor (S-1) due to equilibrium shift by Le Chatelier's principle leading to reduced operating temperatures to produce the same amount of CaF2 as S-1. Consequently, annual cost savings of about 7 to 13% were obtained in S-2 and S-3 compared to S-1 and this can serve as a useful guideline for the efficient system design. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据