4.3 Article

Schizosaccharomyces pombe MutSα and MutLα Maintain Stability of Tetra-Nucleotide Repeats and Msh3 of Hepta-Nucleotide Repeats

期刊

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 1463-1473

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1534/g3.117.040816

关键词

mismatch repair; microsatellite instability; homologous recombination repair; repetitive DNA; FEN1

资金

  1. North West Cancer Research grant [CR947]
  2. National Institute of Social Care and Health Research-Cancer Genetics Biomedical Research Unit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defective mismatch repair (MMR) in humans is associated with colon cancer and instability of microsatellites, that is, DNA sequences with one or several nucleotides repeated. Key factors of eukaryotic MMR are the heterodimers MutSa (Msh2-Msh6), which recognizes base-base mismatches and unpaired nucleotides in DNA, and MutL alpha (Mlh1-Pms1), which facilitates downstream steps. In addition, MutS beta (Msh2-Msh3) recognizes DNA loops of various sizes, although our previous data and the data presented here suggest that Msh3 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe does not play a role in MMR. To test microsatellite stability in S. pombe and hence DNA loop repair, we have inserted tetra-, penta-, and hepta-nucleotide repeats in the ade6 gene and determined their Ade(+) reversion rates and spectra in wild type and various mutants. Our data indicate that loops with four unpaired nucleotides in the nascent and the template strand are the upper limit of MutS alpha- and MutL alpha-mediated MMR in S. pombe. Stability of hepta-nucleotide repeats requires Msh3 and Exo1 in MMR-independent processes as well as the DNA repair proteins Rad50, Rad51, and Rad2(FEN1). Most strikingly, mutation rates in the double mutants msh3 exo1 and msh3 rad51 were decreased when compared to respective single mutants, indicating that Msh3 prevents error prone processes carried out by Exo1 and Rad51. We conclude that Msh3 has no obvious function in MMR in S. pombe, but contributes to DNA repeat stability in MMR-independent processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据