4.5 Article

WHICH DECEPTIVE PRACTICES, IF ANY, SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH? RESULTS FROM SURVEYS OF APPLIED EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMISTS AND STUDENTS

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 610-621

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aav067

关键词

Deception; economic experiments; ethics; experimental auctions; institutional review boards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deceptive experimental practices are banned in some professions but are standard in others. Recently, the journals of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association introduced guidelines that allow researchers to publish articles that use some forms of deception. However, in their present form, these guidelines leave room for interpretation. This situation is not ideal for researchers, and a clearer definition of which deceptive practices should be banned could be beneficial. Our aim is to help provide greater clarity and potential guidance for journal policies regarding deception by using the results of surveys of both researcher and student subjects. Evaluating ten potentially deceptive experimental techniques, we find consistent support for banning certain practices while allowing others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据