4.7 Article

Glycan Stimulation Enables Purification of Prostate Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells on PEDOT NanoVelcro Chips for RNA Biomarker Detection

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700701

关键词

circulating tumor cells; poly(3, 4-ethylene-dioxythiophene)s; prostate cancer; responsive materials; RNA biomarkers

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan [MOST-104-2113-M-001-025-MY2]
  2. Academia Sinica Research Project on Nano Science and Technology
  3. Academia Sinica Thematic Project
  4. DoD [W81XWH-11-1-0422, PC151088]
  5. Steven Spielberg Discovery Fund in Prostate Cancer Research
  6. Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF)
  7. St. Anthony Prostate Cancer Research Fund
  8. CD McKinnon Memorial Fund for Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer
  9. Berns Family Fund
  10. PCF
  11. UCLA Prostate Cancer SPORE Program
  12. NIH/NCI Innovative Molecular Analysis Technologies (IMAT) Program [R21 CA151159, R33 CA157396]
  13. NIH/NCI Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer program [U01 CA 198900]
  14. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA218356, R33CA157396, R21CA151159, U01CA198900, R33CA174562] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A glycan-stimulated and poly(3,4-ethylene-dioxythiophene)s (PEDOT)-based nanomaterial platform is fabricated to purify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood samples of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This new platform, phenylboronic acid (PBA)-grafted PEDOT NanoVelcro, combines the 3D PEDOT nanosubstrate, which greatly enhances CTC capturing efficiency, with a poly(EDOT-PBA-co-EDOT-EG3) interfacial layer, which not only provides high specificity for CTC capture upon antibody conjugation but also enables competitive binding of sorbitol to gently release the captured cells. CTCs purified by this PEDOT NanoVelcro chip provide well-preserved RNA transcripts for the analysis of the expression level of several PCa-specific RNA biomarkers, which may provide clinical insights into the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据