4.7 Article

Efficient Genome Editing of a Facultative Thermophile Using Mesophilic spCas9

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 849-861

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00339

关键词

CRISPR/Cas9; bacteria; Bacillus smithii; thermophiles; genome editing; homologous recombination

资金

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Well-developed genetic tools for thermophilic microorganisms are scarce, despite their industrial and scientific relevance. Whereas highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing is on the rise in prokaryotes, it has never been employed in a thermophile. Here, we apply Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (spCas9)-based genome editing to a moderate thermophile, i.e., Bacillus smithii, including a gene deletion, gene knockout via insertion of premature stop codons, and gene insertion. We show that spCas9 is inactive in vivo above 42 degrees C, and we employ the wide temperature growth range of B. smithii as an induction system for spCas9 expression. Homologous recombination with plasmid-borne editing templates is performed at 45.55 degrees C, when spCas9 is inactive. Subsequent transfer to 37 degrees C allows for counterselection through production of active spCas9, which introduces lethal double-stranded DNA breaks to the nonedited cells. The developed method takes 4 days with 90, 100, and 20% efficiencies for gene deletion, knockout, and insertion, respectively. The major advantage of our system is the limited requirement for genetic parts: only one plasmid, one selectable marker, and a promoter are needed, and the promoter does not need to be inducible or well-characterized. Hence, it can be easily applied for genome editing purposes in both mesophilic and thermophilic nonmodel organisms with a limited genetic toolbox and ability to grow at, or tolerate, temperatures of 37 and at or above 42 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据