4.8 Article

Peptide vaccination in the presence of adjuvants in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with CD4+T cell reconstitution elicits consistent CD8+T cell responses

期刊

THERANOSTICS
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 1705-1718

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/thno.18301

关键词

CMVpp65; CMV

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  2. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
  3. German Cancer Consortium/Deutsches Konsortium fur Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) (DKTK-GMP) [BMBF 01KI0772]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell graft from cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donors are particularly prone to CMV reactivation with a high risk of disease and mortality. Therefore we developed and manufactured a novel vaccine and initiated a clinical phase I trial with a CMV phosphoprotein 65 (CMVpp65)-derived peptide. Methods: Ten patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation received four vaccines at a biweekly interval. All patients were monitored for CMVpp65 antigenemia. Flow cytometry for CMV-specific CD8(+) and gamma delta T cells as well as neutralizing anti-CMV antibodies were correlated to clinical parameters. Results: The vaccination was well tolerated. Seven of nine patients cleared CMVpp65 antigenemia after four vaccinations and are still free from antigenemia to this day. Two patients with CMV reactivation showed persisting CMV antigenemia. One patient received prophylactic vaccination and did not develop antigenemia. An increase of up to six-fold in frequency of both CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells and/or V delta 2negative gamma delta T cells was detected. Titers of neutralizing antibodies increased up to the tenfold. Humoral and cellular immune responses correlated with clearance of CMV. Conclusion: In summary, CMVpp65 peptide vaccination for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation at high risk for CMV reactivation was safe, well tolerated and clinically encouraging. A study in solid-organ transplant patients is ongoing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据