4.7 Article

Targeted next-generation sequencing of the 16S-23S rRNA region for culture-independent bacterial identification - increased discrimination of closely related species

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03458-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. EurSafety Health-net [InterregIVa/III-1-02 = 73]
  2. EurHealth- 1Health [InterregVa/202085]
  3. Dutch-German cross-border network - European Commission
  4. German Federal State of Nordrhein-Westfalen
  5. German Federal State of Niedersachsen
  6. Dutch province of Overijssel
  7. InterregIVa- project
  8. InterregVa- project
  9. Dutch province of Gelderland
  10. Dutch province of Limburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to develop an easy-to-use culture-free diagnostic method based on next generation sequencing (NGS) of PCR amplification products encompassing whole 16S-23S rRNA region to improve the resolution of bacterial species identification. To determine the resolution of the new method 67 isolates were subjected to four identification methods: Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene; NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region using MiSeq (Illumina) sequencer; Microflex MS (Bruker) and VITEK MS (bioMerieux). To evaluate the performance of this new method when applied directly on clinical samples, we conducted a proof of principle study with 60 urine samples from patients suspected of urinary tract infections (UTIs), 23 BacT/ALERT (bioMerieux) positive blood culture bottles and 21 clinical orthopedic samples. The resolution power of NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region was superior to other tested identification methods. Furthermore, the new method correctly identified pathogens established as the cause of UTIs and blood stream infections with conventional culture. NGS of the 16S-23S rRNA region also showed increased detection of bacterial microorganisms in clinical samples from orthopedic patients. Therefore, we conclude that our method has the potential to increase diagnostic yield for detection of bacterial pathogenic species compared to current methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据