4.3 Review

Update of IGF-1 receptor inhibitor (ganitumab, dalotuzumab, cixutumumab, teprotumumab and figitumumab) effects on cancer therapy

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 17, 页码 29501-29518

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15704

关键词

IGF-1R; combination chemotherapy; prognostic clinical trials; cancer treatment; curative effects

资金

  1. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014HQ073]
  2. Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province [2015GSF118063]
  3. Medicine and Health Science Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province [2013WS0103]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prognostic studies of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor( IGF-1R) inhibitors in cancer therapy had promising results in infratests, which exhibited that IGF-1R signalling was crucial in cancer cells growth. However, the conclusion of later clinical trials revealed a dim future for IGF-1R inhibitors to treat cancer. We conducted this analysis to figure out how IGF-1R inhibitors acted in clinical cancer therapy. Material and Methods: We searched up-to-date studies about the single agent of IGF-1R inhibitors or combination with other therapies in solid tumor. Five IGF-1R anti-agents were involved. The primary endpoint was progression- free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Result: 17studies were enrolled. The results was not significant in overall survival (I-2= 37.1%, P= 0.080, HR=1.08, 95% CI= 0.97-1.21) and in progression- free survival (I-2= 0.0%, P= 0.637, HR= 1.05, 95% CI= 0.98-1.12). OS for dalotuzumab, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and PFS for prostate cancer even indicated harmful effects. Conclusion: So far, anti-IGF-1R mono-antibodies did not make significant differences in solid tumor prognosis. On the contrary, pessimistic effects were shown in the dalotuzumab, breast cancer, colorectal cancer and prostate cancer subgroups. Further studies of IGF-1R anti-agents were needed, but unwarranted in unselected patients by predictive biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据