4.3 Article

Systematic evaluation of supervised classifiers for fecal microbiota-based prediction of colorectal cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 9546-9556

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14488

关键词

gut microbiota; CRC; supervised classifier; prediction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81572326, 81322036, 30971330, 31371420, 81320108024, 81000861, 81421001, 81272383]
  2. Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China [ZTZ2015-48]
  3. Shanghai Oriental Scholars project [2013XJ]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gao feng Clinical Medicine [20152514]
  5. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAI13B07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) based on fecal microbiota presents a promising method for non-invasive screening of CRC, but the optimization of classification models remains an unaddressed question. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of different supervised machine-learning models in predicting CRC in two independent eastern and western populations. The structures of intestinal microflora in feces in Chinese population (N = 141) were determined by 454 FLX pyrosequencing, and different supervised classifiers were employed to predict CRC based on fecal microbiota operational taxonomic unit (OTUs). As a result, Bayes Net and Random Forest displayed higher accuracies than other algorithms in both populations, although Bayes Net was found with a lower false negative rate than that of Random Forest. Gut microbiota-based prediction was more accurate than the standard fecal occult blood test (FOBT), and the combination of both approaches further improved the prediction accuracy. Moreover, when unclassified OTUs were used as input, the BayesDMNB text algorithm achieved higher accuracy in the Chinese population (AUC=0.994). Taken together, our results suggest that Bayes Net classification model combined with unclassified OTUs may present an accurate method for predicting CRC based on the compositions of gut microbiota.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据